deceptikhan
2008-08-27
2:45 pm
|
It gives us plenty of time to see if we really want it or not. Im looking at getting the Seacons as of now though. The "gimmick" does sound/look pretty cool, but looks can be decieving. |
KingMab
2008-08-27
7:27 am
|
There are no signs at the moment as to whether this will be full fledged line like Binaltech. IMO it looks more like a one off type line like Sports Label or a very limited line like Hybrid Style and Music Label. We'll just have to wait and see. |
harrismonkey
2008-08-27
6:37 am
|
So far we know about two color variations of one toy. Is there really any serious evidence that they intend to develop a full line like this? |
John 14:6
2008-08-27
2:46 am
|
I like all the automorphs I have (most movie, classic toys; no animated). The automorphs mostly transform one other small thing and there's a TON left to transform. It's not like Beast Wars Razorback (who I love nonetheless) that completely transforms with the flick of a switch. |
onixprime
2008-08-27
2:08 am
|
Ive only liked a few automorph gimmicks. ironhides wasn't too bad, nor was movie optimus. then you have animated starscream and lugnut who shouldn't have had automorph at all. lugnut especially since his front end never stays closed in vehicle mode. |
justinrhyme
2008-08-27
2:04 am
|
|
timothyVritchey
2008-08-27
1:49 am
|
i kind of understand what you're saying.. but what if sunstreakers automorph broke or wasn't working properly.. then sunstreaker wouldn't have a head. i |
Talkie Toaster
2008-08-27
12:41 am
|
to me I either love an automorph gimmick or hate it, an example of love would be universe sunstreaker, i love the way when you twist the windscreen the head pops out, it is useful as it does not compromise the articulation or look of the figure to do it. At the other endof the scale we have Movie B... read more |
Beast Megatron
2008-08-26
10:14 pm
|
I love the automorph feature. It makes the Transformer seem more "real". |
( . Y . )
2008-08-26
9:04 pm
|
|
Link to TFormers.com
