Articulation: 14 total points - Ball joint neck; 3 points each arm: Ball joint shoulder, bicep swivel, hinge elbow; Waist swivel; 3 points each leg: Ball joint hip, thigh swivel, hinge knee.
Colors: Molded maroon, dark grey, light grey, black, purple; Painted maroon, grey, bronze, silver, black, purple.
Accessories: Combiner Extremity, beating pipe.
Release Data: Released in the United States in April of 2015 at a retail price of US$14.99
Most Decepticons would say the Autobots are doomed. Dead End is the only one who'd say the same about the Decepticons. He's convinced the end of the universe is right around the corner, and he's going out with his blasters blazing.
Dead End is the Stunticon I expected to like. Going by the stock photos and
later when people overseas were getting them ahead of the US release and we got
more and better pictures, Dead End just looked the most together. I didn't have
the immediate distaste for Breakdown like many seemed to, but Dead End really
just hit the notes for me better. I don't think I realized before I had them
just how similar the two were, though.
Now, on my copy the hip joints are on the loose side. That may vary by the unit, though. Plus that's fixable with a couple of options so it's not as much of a big deal. But actually, most of the joints feel far less tight than what they seem like they should. The thigh swivels move a little too smoothly, but that's about the least to be concerned with since that joint would never really be load-bearing. The weird thing here is the knees. Besides that they're also farther toward the "smooth" side of things than I think is good for the toy overall, the outer discs of the hinge are grooved in a way I would expect to see as a component of a "soft-ratcheting" joint. Except it doesn't, and there doesn't seem to be anything trying to catch the notches. I could be misreading it, I'll grant you, but I can't shake that something feels off right there. The waist joint is a little loose too, but only for the few degrees to either side of center. Meaning that it can do just enough to pitch the body to one side or another to be annoying before it stops itself.
The arms are just designed weird. There's a basically functional double shoulder joint, mainly there to make the transformation work, but let's not dismiss a free point of meaningful articulation. The stems of the shoulder ball joints are offset, so the actual point of movement in the shoulder is a little higher than the shoulder line itself. It makes the arms sit noticeably high, and combined with the fact that the arms are a bit short in the first place, things gets to looking weird. You might try to push the hinge side of the shoulder down to normalize the proportions a little. Not a bad idea, except that hinge is soft ratcheted to help it bear heavier load like the Combiner Extremity weapon, I guess. So the next step down from the intended robot mode position is too low. And even if you decided you preferred that to shoulder too high, the angle you're forced to kills a lot of the range of motion of the ball joint.
The elbows have to be bent, or else the hands barely make it past the waist. Bending the elbow a little makes the inner line of the arm look straight, but from the outside the positions of the panels reinforce that it's always bent. Plus, going with the inside line, if you try to pose the arm so it's hanging what looks like straight down on the inside, panels on the back of the forearms bump against the wheels on the backpack. So the arms always need to be pointed forward some, or you have to bend the arm more so the bicep can be straight, but then the arm always appears bent from wherever you're looking. Effectively, there's no way to reconcile everything so that the arm positioning looks completely natural. Anyway, the elbow joint is a hinge, and it's offset to the front. Usually this has the effect of giving double-joint range of motion with a single joint. But no, there's a tiny bit of panel on the forearm that hits another panel on the bicep and blocks the movement after 90 degrees. And there's no specific reason that panel has to exist on the forearm. It's part of the door paneling, but that could have been represented in the actual structure of the forearm rather than an extra projection that only serves to get in the way and pointlessly restrict a perfectly good joint.
Speaking of pointless, there's the wrists. They serve no benefit to posing since they only hinge inward so they can store away in vehicle mode. Now, let's make this clear: the way they're made to move means that they don't have an inherent difficulty holding something heavy. They don't flip down or have a ball joint or anything that would lead to potential sagging when holding a heavy accessory, right? But the wrist hinges are soft ratchets. And that was when my comprehension broke. Because I just cannot figure out at all what that could be doing for the toy at all, especially over giving the knees or even elbows that treatment. The knees moreso since they're a major load-bearing point in the arm mode, but even the elbows could be seen as having a practical purpose. Why are the wrists that move to no effect other than hiding in car mode given ratcheting? It makes no sense!
The neck is ball jointed. It's not very mobile outside of swiveling, and that is itself restricted to 90 degrees left or right thanks to the big hinge behind the head bumping the helmet details. The head design is very much media based, with visor and faceplate rather than the original toy's actual face. It has been detail enhanced some, and looks really cool as its been done. That's really the strength of the figure too, the style of the design is really good.
The chest flap hiding the combiner plug, and the torso itself is more angular, so Dead End looks a bit slimmer than Breakdown. The chest plate has generic mechanical detailing sculpted in, just enough to be interesting looking. The arms look big and thick, which setting aside anything to do with the functional aspects works really well in the toy's favor. The legs are a bit simple, but have clear panel layers and vent details and the like to make sure they fit in. The boots look cool too with a similar aesthetic driving the sculpt. The chest is probably the most complex bit of sculpt. Everything else does a lot with a little and presents this nice simplicity that really grabs me.
So, here's an interesting thing. Dead End disposes of the car's hood and windshield in a way very similar to Breakdown. The windshield flips back and sticks off the lower back and the hood folds to make up the backpack. Except Dead End gets the top of the hood facing out the back so the hollow side of that chunk is hidden. If you've read Breakdown's review already, you'll know that there was good reason to let that hood show the empty face, but it is very proof of concept that it was never outright necessary to do that in the first place. And y'know, if not for the windshield panel, Dead End would have a pretty tidy looking back. But the way the hood rests on the back, it's not able to cover that up. It's unfortunate for sure.
Dead End's deco is pretty good here, but there will certainly be some things that could bug you. First off, points where they're due: The maroon paint is a really good match for the plastic color. You have to really scrutinize to tell them apart even where they meet on the toy. The little bit of bronze highlights are also really nice and fit the surrounding maroon really well. No, it's really just the grey where you're gonna be upset. Two shades are used, one likely representing unpaintable plastic, if not both. But like, the pelvis is one grey, and the thighs are another, and then the knees are the first grey again. It looks really unattractively mismatched. The second grey would need to be a lot darker to make this end up working as a two tone scheme. As it is, you just get the feeling like from a bad paint/plastic color match. It looks bad and messes up an otherwise good look.
So, Dead End isn't doing anything especially different from Breakdown,
except that it takes some different approaches to accomplishing the same ends
and results in a generally much more pleasant experience. The legs have a very
simple and incredibly intuitive series of moves to become the rear end of the
car and collapse in on themselves. The only part maybe not immediately obvious
is needing to rotate the waist first. The arms slide down in place very easily,
and most of the move to set up the hood goes well too. There are notch points
on the hinges involved that sometimes feel like you're not supposed to go past
them, but you actually are in order to get it to do what's needed, and then
everything is fine. This is the kind of fun, Aerialbot-like process overall
that I was hoping for with Breakdown. I'm glad to see one of them got it
There is a dragging/scraping problem with the underbody, where what are in the place the robots toes should be hang far enough down to touch a tabletop. If you try to roll the car, it just scrapes along while either the front or real set of wheels turn, but not all of them at the same time. That is more than a little disappointing, honestly. The lack of real feet elements was bad enough already in robot mode, but that same design choice is adversely affecting the only function the vehicle mode even has. There is one other thing it can do, but it's fully unintentional and something I just noticed by accident and found to be amusing. The rear quarter panels, including the wheels, can hinge up easily in vehicle mode, orienting the tires almost perfectly as hoverfans. Add to that the combiner port on the back looking a little like a jet engine, and you can get a halfway passable flying car mode out of Dead End. Again, fully unintended, but it was good enough to amuse me and add some value to the vehicle mode.
The deco is pretty good. The maroon is much more prominent, broken up by the bronze racing stripe more than anything. The windows don't seem as super-gloss as Breakdown, but they're okay. The hubcaps and headlight strips all get picked out in silver, and the bumper, grill and foglight bank all get colored over in gunmetal similar to the dark grey plastic. And there's the rub. The door panels keep the grey alive in this mode by painting the air dams in gunmetal. This also is to do with a chunk of grey plastic that makes up part of the arms intersecting the door surface. But it looks like that grey in an unpaintable plastic, so while the air dam maintains its color, above and below the maroon is just interrupted in a really ugly way. I try to be tolerant and understanding of the limitations of some required materials, but there had to be a better deco solution to this to get everything to blend together better. It's really the only significant blemish to the car's deco, and it sadly stands out to a disproportionate degree.
I had a very interesting question posed to me by HeyMickey, who asked me where Dead End's arms are supposed to go when Dead End was being an arm. At that point I hadn't combined the toys yet, so I had no answer. But when I came around to doing a test fit, I realized there was no good answer. This is probably not going to be true of every torso, but on Menasor where Dead End "belongs", the toy's arms majorly get in the way and there's very little you can do about it. Leaving them in place for vehicle mode isn't any good, or taking them and pointing them upward, or trying to find a way to point them away that doesn't look stupid. There's just nothing there that doesn't make a problem. The only thing I worked out was to angle them back. That can move the offending edges away from Motormaster, and at least looks less dumb than some alternatives that didn't work as well. There's no locking like this, so if you grab Dead End by the body to move his arm mode, you're going to be pushing around the robot arms. You can use Dead End's hood instead. It stays in place solidly, so the twisting motion will result in moving the arm before moving the hood chunk.
The leg mode is just the car with the hood folded back and a foot under it, there's no big thing here. But take note, the instructions give bad advice for how the car's hood should be arranged. It can and does fold all the way back against the roof of the car instead of sticking straight out and looking weird. I'm afraid there's not a good option for pointing the hood up and using it as a knee plate, though. The hinges just don't work to get stuff close enough to do it.
Dead End is really interesting when taken in comparison with Breakdown. Because both of them are ultimately trying to do the same things, but take different approaches to it. If you told me that two designers were each presented with the same base concept and told to both independently make a toy out of it, I'd probably believe it. Unfortunately in this study of divergent evolution, Breakdown comes out mostly ahead. Dead End does some good things. I super appreciate the ease and simple fun of the transformation, and there's plenty in the visual styling I like. But there's things that just don't work for me, like the arm design, in which I guess we'd also include the extraneous grey on the doors in car mode. The difficulty using Dead End as an arm isn't helping anything either. ...which comes back down to the robot arms. Geez, those things basically ruined EVERYTHING.
Dead End scores in the Could Have Been Better range of the Figurereviews Non-Numeric Scale. But that's with the qualifier that the things about Dead End I like, I like quite a bit. There are just important things that need to be better and drag the toy down a step. I'd like to hope for Steetwise to be different enough to avoid a lot of this, but I'll have to wait and see how that actually works out. It is tempering my enthusiasm for Wildrider - or rather, Brake-Neck, however.
|Date||April 9th 2015|
|Score||(5 out of 10)|
Entertainment News International (ENI) is the popular culture network for fans all around the world.
Get the scoop on all the popular comics, games, movies, toys, and more every day!
©Entertainment News International - All images, trademarks, logos, video, brands and images used on this website are registered trademarks of their respective companies and owners. All Rights Reserved. Data has been shared for news reporting purposes only. All content sourced by fans, online websites, and or other fan community sources. Entertainment News International is not responsible for reporting errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and or other liablities related to news shared here. We do our best to keep tabs on infringements. If some of your content was shared by accident. Contact us about any infringements right away - CLICK HERE