Transformers Daily News Source for Transformers 5, Titans Return, Robots in Disguise, Combiner Wars, Generations, Third Party, G1, Beast Wars, Reviews, Comics, Games & More Than Meets the Eye!
TFormers Transformers News and Reviews
facebook twitter Pinterest Tumblr Google+ youtube podcast rss
Third Party
Play With This Too - Analyzing A Kickstarter That Didn't Quite Get There
ExVee & RAC - Wednesday, April 01, 2015


So, after a lengthy buildup and a month of actual fundraising, the Play With This Too Kickstarter was, sadly, a close miss. Coming within $8400 of the goal with 406 backers, the Lost Protectors will, for the moment, remain lost. So what happened, and what could be done about it if - hopefully when - they try again?

In our opinion, the main issue that may have existed with this campaign was simply the sheer scope of it. In what we can perceive as an attempt to give a measure of accessibility to anyone, the project may have become so overwrought as to be intimidating or outright off-putting to potential backers. In the end, there were a total of 38 pledge levels ranging from $1 to $900 and even a $1600 level for those especially enthusiastic about particular aspects of the toy design process. The problem is, it was hard to tell by this point what one needed to pledge to in order to get exactly what they might want. For each figure they planned to offer initially, there was a separate pledge level of equal value, and also packages of multiple figures offered that featured a variety of combinations of the individuals. Besides having such a volume of options as to be overwhelming, the redundancy in the presentation made it difficult to figure out how to get to the end result you were after. And I think that was a cyclical problem. If they had removed the exacting specificity of pledging for a particular figure as its own level, and instead made it a blanket $55 with the understanding that the backer could choose the figure he or she liked later, the number of explicitly presented options would have been cut down significantly.

We understand the enthusiasm that would lead to the decision of including what practically amounted to stretch goals to make an entire toyline, but the actual pursuit of that came off as simply unrealistic. Plus by presenting a fixed selection of figures for immediate pledge levels and showing others that would be available later, a sense of “holding back” and even trying to push for more stretch goal levels to be reached might have given a negative impression of the campaign in itself. Keeping those in reserve is not wrong, but presenting so much potential product at the start was likely a mis-step. But they may have felt that by showing so many concept art pieces prior to the Kickstarter, that there was an obligation to show that all of it was at least theoretically ready to be produced, if the price was right. Keeping most of that out of sight and just focusing on an initial offering may well have smoothed a lot of edges, both in the campaign’s own presentation, and the general reception it got.

Big Gamble



So, at the higher end was a $900 pledge level, which promised the entire first run worth of figures, among additional rewards. With 150 of these slots, had all of them sold, the campaign would have been funded and at least one stretch goal reached. When looking at the numbers involved, it’s hard not to reach the conclusion that they might have been wanting that specific outcome. We’re left to wonder if counting on such an expensive level to sell completely to make sure the project reached its funding goal - and so perhaps taking any other pledges as being gravy and fodder for more stretch goal - was that a component in the campaign not making it’s minimum requirements?

And the greater cause may be that the first level where one would receive a toy, the clear intention of this project in the first place, might have been priced outside a general comfort level. While practical concerns, such as possible gang-molding of parts might have prevented some options for lower-priced toy tiers, we still think that the option should have been explored more to find a compromise to make it work. If not the Tech Drones, then the Headshots. Something tangible with a toy-value that doesn’t cost $55 to help get people on board that want a playable reward but may not be comfortable going as far as the full figure’s worth. There were so many $55 level pledges out there, but none of them addressed the basic problem of accessibility.

A Steep Curve



And the accessibility problem shows very clearly in how the rewards were structured. As we mentioned before, actual action figures don’t come into the picture until the $55 level - the sixth tier. Beneath that are a series of ancillary items - a T-Shirt, prints, desktop backgrounds - and how much are those going to mean to those who can’t or won’t pledge the $55 for a figure? The most toyetic reward is a glow-in-the-dark button at the $15 level that was promised to be compatible with the figures (and anything else that uses 5 millimeter pegs). But tellingly, on a page full of concept art for every conceivable figure and stretch goal, there is no art for the button at all.

Unfortunately at this stage of their life, the honest truth is no one cares enough about Play With This Too as an entity to simply pledge for a shirt or art print just as a means of showing their support of this start-up. Had PWWToo managed to release some kind of product beforehand and developed a real presence as a toy-maker, that might be a different case, but ultimately filling in the low-end tiers with these kind of items was never a wise choice in anything but consideration of production costs. Making them all available as add-ons to standard pledge tiers may have tipped the scale to their favor a bit more, but using them as standalone incentives was misguided at best.

The Future



Should they try again? Yes, absolutely. The beauty of a Kickstarter versus alternative forms of initial funding is that the ability to simply try again is very much on their side. And while this campaign didn’t proceed as smoothly as anyone would have hoped for, it doesn’t mean that the project itself lacks merit. The products they intend to bring are very interesting and in drawing from a wide variety of sources can easily attract interest from a diverse range of people, making eventually developing a traditional market for these that much easier.

But this will depend largely on what lesson they’ve taken away from this attempt. If any of the Play With This Too crowd are reading, here are our suggestions:

  • Fewer pledge options. You don't have to massively limit the choices
    that can be made, but make that choice a later element. It should be enough
    to let someone pledge $55 to get "a figure" which they can
    specify at a later time.

  • Lower-cost accessibility. Develop some level of toy that can fit at most
    a $25 pledge tier. Your main figures can't budget down that far, and
    that's okay, but let people come away with a toy even if they
    can't commit $55 or more to this.

  • Save the stretch goals. Focus on getting the first figures done and
    building an actual customer base before growing any farther. It looks bad
    on all fronts having numerous stretch goals, and worse still when none of
    them get met.

  • In short: simplify your pitch. It's obvious there's
    a lot of cool things you want to do - and we know from your individual work
    histories that you're more than capable of doing them. But all of it
    taken together - pledge levels, stretch goals, reams of concept art - is
    simply overwhelming.

  • And also, maybe try to focus more on making your goal with the modest
    packages. Selling a few high price packages and being done with the basic
    requirement is great, if you can get it. But at this point it's
    probably time to think about approaching from a different direction.



But again, and above all, we sincerely hope that you guys try this again. We’re rooting for your success because we like what we see in the pipeline. We just really want to see it have the best chance possible at actually getting made.

TFormers Member Comments

NO COMMENTS YET - Start the Coversation by Posting Yours Now!

»  POST A COMMENT ON THIS STORY - CLICK HERE!  «
     (Membership Required)

More Third Party News
Mastermind Creations shared a few photos of their display at Cyber City Con, which had samples of some upcoming products. Azalea falls under the Ocular Max branding, and is a Masterpiece-style Arcee, offering its particular take on the familiar and now often-repeated G1 Arcee design. Also seen was Foxwire which will be part of the Reformatted series. This represents The Pet, as seen among the Decepticon Justice Division in select issues of More Than Meets The Eye. No release date or other details are available for these items at this time, but you can check out the display photos below!
This week on Radio Free Cybertron: Tons of Authentics talk this week. What do the "evergreen" toys do for Transformers fans? Plus we discuss the newly discovered Studio Series, and talk about movie toys we'd like to see tackled again. Also on the show we talk about the future of Transformers Legends from Takara Tomy, and two more third party Cliffjumpers on the way. All that plus we answer listener questions this week! 


On their Facebook page, Planet X posted a number of photos of grey testshot samples of their trio of unofficial Insecticons, based on their appearances in Fall of Cybertron. As you may recall, previously an official Kickback was released based on this design as part of the 2012/2013 Generations line, but this will be a first shot at a physical representation for the other two. We get to see basic front and back views of each figure and some group shots. Scale, pricing, and planned release timeframe were not revealed in this post. Click through to see the mirrored images!
Alien Attack Toys' latest unofficial transforming robot offering appears to be starting to hit availability in parts of Asia. Through a couple of sources we have some in hand shots of what looks like a final (or if not a very, very close to final sample) of El Cid, based on Optimus Prime more or less as he appears in Age of Extinction, and The Last Knight. In particular we get to see things like the weapons in full color, and some close looks at the unmasked face option. Check out the images just below!
Via the Weibo pages of Alucardlee, and SunOfTheEmpire, we have a number of photos to share of Blitzkrieg, the Onslaught of Zeta Toys' unofficial Combaticon team. The images show a figure that can be switched from a cartoon inspired blank chest panel or a toy-derived, higher detail chest to suit different visual priorities. But mostly we see the 'combat base' made of most of the Bruticus torso elements, as well as how it can interact with Zeta's not-Blast Off as a launch platform. Plus we have some bonus shots showing a fully assembled Armageddon combined form. Click through to see them now!












Toy Fair 2018 Transformers News!


Optimus Prime Issue 15
Generations IDW Comic Book
Battleslash
Generations Power of The Primes Legends Class Figure
Roadtrap
Generations Power of The Primes Legends Class Figure
Transformers Vs. Visionaries #1
Generations IDW Comic Book
Lost Light Issue #12
Generations IDW Comic Book

Masterpiece MP-40 Targetmaster Hot Rod In Hand Photos With Comparisons To MP-28
Masterpiece MP-40 Targetmaster Hot Rod In Hand Photos With Comparisons To MP-28

Transformers: Lost Light #15 Comic Book Preview - SECRETS AND LIES!
Transformers: Lost Light #15 Comic Book Preview - SECRETS AND LIES!

First Looks at Wizards of the Coast Transformers G1 Trading Card Game!
First Looks at Wizards of the Coast Transformers G1 Trading Card Game!

RADIO FREE CYBERTRON






ENI
About
Entertainment News International (ENI) is the popular culture network for fans all around the world. Get the scoop on all the popular comics, games, movies, toys, and more every day!
Sites
Action Figures
Entertainment
Marvel
 
Podcasts
Star Wars
Transformers
Links
Support
© 2018 Entertainment News International - All images, trademarks, logos, video, brands and images used on this website are registered trademarks of their respective companies and or owners. All Rights Reserved. Data has been shared for news reporting purposes only. All content sourced by fans, online websites, and or other fan community sources. Entertainment News International is not responsible for reporting errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and or other liablities related to news shared here. We do our best to keep tabs on infringements. If some of your content was shared by accident. To have it removed right away, please [ Contact Us ].